{"id":100889,"date":"2026-05-09T08:34:17","date_gmt":"2026-05-09T08:34:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/?p=100889"},"modified":"2026-05-09T08:34:17","modified_gmt":"2026-05-09T08:34:17","slug":"monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cMonsters\u201d, by Claire Dederer: the uneasy pleasure of loving imperfect art"},"content":{"rendered":"

There are books that do not arrive to settle a debate, but to prevent us from resolving it too quickly. “Monsters: What Do We Do with Great Art by Bad People?”<\/strong>, by Claire Dederer<\/span><\/span><\/em>, begins with an uncomfortable question \u2014can we love the work of morally flawed artists?\u2014 and turns it into something far more interesting than a verdict: an exploration of pleasure, guilt, beauty and the contradictions of the viewer.<\/p>\n

The origin of a shared discomfort<\/span><\/h6>\n

The seed of the book lies in an essay published in 2017 in The Paris Review<\/em>, at the height of the #MeToo<\/em> movement. That piece, which quickly went viral, opened a fissure in the contemporary cultural conversation: what do we do with art created by men who have been \u2014or are\u2014 morally questionable?<\/p>\n

\u201cThe seed of the book lies in an essay published in 2017 in The Paris Review, at the height of the #MeToo movement.\u201d<\/h2>\n

Rather than positioning herself as judge or prosecutor, Dederer<\/em> writes from a more unstable terrain: that of personal contradiction. She describes her work as an \u201cautobiography of the audience\u201d<\/em>, and that choice is telling. There is no theory here without lived experience, no criticism without emotional involvement. There is love for art, and discomfort within that love.<\/p>\n

Against moral purity<\/span><\/h6>\n

One of the book\u2019s most provocative strengths lies in dismantling the premise of the question itself. Can we separate the work from the artist? For Dederer<\/em>, the question is a trap. Not because it is irrelevant, but because it oversimplifies an experience that is inherently complex.<\/p>\n

The contemporary viewer \u2014that reader, listener or cinephile shaped by the ethical awareness of the 21st century\u2014 lives in a constant tension: reluctant to give up what moves them, yet unwilling to ignore the shadows of its creator. Instead of offering a clean resolution, Dederer<\/em> suggests something more demanding: holding both realities at once. Not cancelling, not absolving, but looking directly.<\/p>\n

The shift: when monstrosity changes gender<\/span><\/h6>\n

The second half of the book introduces a shift that is as unexpected as it is necessary. What happens when the \u201cmonster\u201d is a woman?<\/p>\n

Dederer<\/em> brings forward figures such as Sylvia Plath<\/em>, Doris Lessing<\/em> and Joni Mitchell<\/em> \u2014artists who, at different moments, were criticised for having left their children. In that act, culturally perceived as one of the greatest female transgressions, she identifies a different form of monstrosity: not one of violence or abuse, but of abandonment.<\/p>\n

Here, the essay becomes more intimate, more exposed. As both a mother and a writer, Dederer<\/em> reflects on the extent to which creation may require a degree of selfishness \u2014or \u201cmonstrosity\u201d\u2014 that society continues to judge differently depending on gender. It is a shift that deepens the conversation and moves it away from any easy conclusions.<\/p>\n

A voice that thinks aloud<\/span><\/h6>\n

Far from an academic tone, “Monsters”<\/em> unfolds as an ongoing conversation with herself. There are fragments of personal memory, glimpses of life in the Pacific Northwest, echoes of her work as a cultural critic. This confessional texture is precisely what transforms the book into something beyond a traditional essay, bringing it closer to a deeply recognisable reading experience. Dederer<\/em> doesn’t position herself above the reader; she sits beside them.<\/p>\n

The value of not resolving<\/span><\/h6>\n

In a time defined by rapid positioning and categorical opinions, “Monsters”<\/em> insists on something more complex: the right to inconsistency. There is no definitive theory on what to do with Michael Jackson<\/em>, nor a universal moral guide for consuming culture.<\/p>\n

Perhaps this is where its honesty lies. Ultimately, Dederer<\/em> suggests that our relationship with art does not automatically make us better or worse people. What it does is force us to think, to feel uncomfortable, to sit with questions that resist final answers.<\/p>\n

A necessary, unsettling essay<\/span><\/h6>\n

“Monsters”<\/em> doesn’t seek to close the debate, but to leave it wide open. That is precisely where its strength lies. It offers neither refuge nor punishment, only an uneasy coexistence with what we love.<\/p>\n

Perhaps that is why the book resonates: it does not attempt to make us better readers or better people. Only more aware of what we are doing when we admire something \u2014and of what we are willing to overlook in order to continue doing so.<\/p>\n

\u201cRather than positioning herself as judge, Dederer writes from a more unstable terrain: that of personal contradiction.\u201d<\/h2>\n

Highly recommended.<\/p>\n

(*)<\/strong> Cover illustration by Cathy Lomax.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

There are books that do not arrive to settle a debate, but to prevent us from resolving it too quickly. “Monsters: What Do We Do with Great Art by Bad People?”, by Claire Dederer, begins with an uncomfortable question \u2014can we love the work of morally flawed artists?\u2014 and turns it into something far more […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":100880,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5905,5903],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-100889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-books","category-culture-en"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\u201cMonsters\u201d, by Claire Dederer: the pleasure of loving imperfect art<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"An editorial review of Monsters by Claire Dederer, exploring the moral tension of loving art created by flawed artists.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u201cMonsters\u201d, by Claire Dederer: the pleasure of loving imperfect art\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"An editorial review of Monsters by Claire Dederer, exploring the moral tension of loving art created by flawed artists.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Cathy_Lomax_Monsters-1.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@cecilecollage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@cecilecollage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Cecilia Camacho\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/\",\"name\":\"\u201cMonsters\u201d, by Claire Dederer: the pleasure of loving imperfect art\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Cathy_Lomax_Monsters-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-09T08:34:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/52a8bfc6898cc8937794edb7e040be91\"},\"description\":\"An editorial review of Monsters by Claire Dederer, exploring the moral tension of loving art created by flawed artists.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Cathy_Lomax_Monsters-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Cathy_Lomax_Monsters-1.jpg\",\"width\":1251,\"height\":995},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Portada\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cMonsters\u201d, by Claire Dederer: the uneasy pleasure of loving imperfect art\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/\",\"name\":\"CC\/magazine\",\"description\":\"Independent online magazine of lifestyle, design, cities and innovation\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/52a8bfc6898cc8937794edb7e040be91\",\"name\":\"Cecilia Camacho\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e580c7637b737a8ac4e4b6c32ea669fc423e6a5b616923ba41a93138e673c93d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e580c7637b737a8ac4e4b6c32ea669fc423e6a5b616923ba41a93138e673c93d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Cecilia Camacho\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/ccmagazine.es\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u201cMonsters\u201d, by Claire Dederer: the pleasure of loving imperfect art","description":"An editorial review of Monsters by Claire Dederer, exploring the moral tension of loving art created by flawed artists.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u201cMonsters\u201d, by Claire Dederer: the pleasure of loving imperfect art","twitter_description":"An editorial review of Monsters by Claire Dederer, exploring the moral tension of loving art created by flawed artists.","twitter_image":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Cathy_Lomax_Monsters-1.jpg","twitter_creator":"@cecilecollage","twitter_site":"@cecilecollage","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Cecilia Camacho","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/","url":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/","name":"\u201cMonsters\u201d, by Claire Dederer: the pleasure of loving imperfect art","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Cathy_Lomax_Monsters-1.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-09T08:34:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/52a8bfc6898cc8937794edb7e040be91"},"description":"An editorial review of Monsters by Claire Dederer, exploring the moral tension of loving art created by flawed artists.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Cathy_Lomax_Monsters-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Cathy_Lomax_Monsters-1.jpg","width":1251,"height":995},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/monsters-claire-dederer-review-art-bad-people\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Portada","item":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cMonsters\u201d, by Claire Dederer: the uneasy pleasure of loving imperfect art"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/","name":"CC\/magazine","description":"Independent online magazine of lifestyle, design, cities and innovation","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/52a8bfc6898cc8937794edb7e040be91","name":"Cecilia Camacho","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e580c7637b737a8ac4e4b6c32ea669fc423e6a5b616923ba41a93138e673c93d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e580c7637b737a8ac4e4b6c32ea669fc423e6a5b616923ba41a93138e673c93d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Cecilia Camacho"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/ccmagazine.es"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100889"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100889\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":100891,"href":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100889\/revisions\/100891"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/100880"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ccmagazine.es\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}